[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Question about glossaries
I must disagree. I use to render acronyms in boldface, not italics, which I use for foreign words (mostly English). I think Norm is right in not providing any default in this case. ============================================= Marcelo Jaccoud Amaral Petrobrás (http://www.petrobras.com.br) mailto:jaccoud@petrobras.com.br voice: +55 21 2534-3485 fax: +55 21 2534-1809 ============================================= There are only 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't. Dave Pawson <dpawson@nildram. Para: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, Bob Stayton co.uk> <bobs@caldera.com> cc: Giuseppe Greco <giuseppe.greco@bluewin.ch>, DocBook 04/10/2002 13:46 <docbook@lists.oasis-open.org> Assunto: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: Question about glossaries At 11:55 04/10/2002, Norman Walsh wrote: >|> Why the content of the <acronym> elements are not rendered >|> when generating a glossary document? > >Because I have no idea how best to render them in the general case. >But I'm open to suggestions. <em>content</em> As a suggestion, html. Equivalent fo perhaps? italics, same font. I.e. nominal emphasis, inline. regards DaveP
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC