[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: What is the best way to express a relationshipbetween two biblioentrys
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:55:15AM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > / Alan Cocks <ajcocks@connexus.net.au> was heard to say: > | I gather from the element reference in *Docbook: TDG* that to express the relationship between, say, an article and the journal in which it is published, one should use two BIBLIOSETs inside a single BIBLIOENTRY. > | > | However, how should one express the relationship between two distinct BIBLIOENTRYs? > | > | I've searched the docbook@lists.oasis-open.org archive and on the web, but I haven't found a clear answer. > | > | The kinds of cases I have in mind are: > | > | - one biblioentry representing an article published in a journal, and another representing the anthology in which it is reprinted > | > | - conversely, one biblioentry (eg, a newspaper article) that is an extract from another (eg, a book) > | > | - one biblioentry (an article) that is a review of another (a book by a different author) > | > | - two biblioentrys representing different language editions or different revisions of the same book > > You could simply put the two biblioentrys next to each other. For what > purpose do you want to establish a link between them? Or putting it another way, how to traditional bibliographies indicate such links? I seem to recall Latin like op cit and such. -- Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street Publications Architect Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Technical Publications voice: (831) 427-7796 The SCO Group fax: (831) 429-1887 email: bobs@sco.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC