[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] strict versus transitional XHTML tables [was: DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 18 Mar 2003]
At 21:11 2003 03 18 +0000, Dave Pawson wrote: >At 14:38 18/03/2003 -0600, Paul Grosso wrote: ><snip/> >>Personally, I'd have a hard time taking background color and fixed >>height rows away from users. > >Heck, why not Paul. Docbook fully supports that separation? How is the author supposed to indicate to the DocBook stylesheets what color background they would like for a given cell? Would you feel that <td role="green-background"> is more in keeping with the DocBook precedent? >> While I could live with omitting some >>of the presentation attributes, that seems too confusing. Since tables >>by definition already have a fair number of presentation attributes even >>in the "strict" version, I see no harm in using the transitional version >>of the XHTML 1.0 table model [2]. > >I'd support strict anytime. What harm do you see in having a bgcolor attribute on table cells in the version of the HTML table model that DocBook might incorporate? paul
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]