[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
Ah, I see that procedures can be inside things that can be in procedures etc (listitem, admons). It never occurred to me to try that. Never mind. David -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Biss [mailto:jeff@marco-inc.com] Placing a procedure within a table doesn't add much but could provide a better indication of where the procedure starts and stops because of the table's lines. I was forced to do this when working for a customer to David Cramer wrote: >Nested procedures, procedures inside of tables, etc. would be messy--not >sure how you'd number them. <substeps> allows you to nest procedures >without that problem. I think no procedures in paras is a good thing. > >David
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]