[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: Conventions for IDs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / BigSmoke <bigsmoke@home.nl> was heard to say: | Is there some sort of convention as how to name the IDs in a DocBook document, | or an XML document in general. I've used IDs like 'section-Some_title', but | when I look around, I see more IDs like 'section.some.title'? Is there some | kind of underlying philosophy behind the naming in, for example, the TDG or | the DocBook XSL stylesheets? Nope. They have to be unique, that's all. I tend, personally, to use strings that I'm likely to remember while I'm working on a document so that I don't have to go lookup the ID when I want to xref to it. Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Next to knowing when to seize an http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | opportunity, the most important Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | thing in life is to know when to | forego an advantage.--Benjamin | Disraeli -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+dba5OyltUcwYWjsRApE+AJ0bsMdBhYOnlPnYtGmfK6PfmNKFbQCgkBHj xgFVVhBMUuHf1oxzPXMKcOI= =JZOz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]