[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Ruminations on the future of DocBook
At 15:57 30/05/2003 -0400, Adam Turoff wrote: >On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:05:38PM -0500, Jeff Biss wrote: > > This does make sense for the reasons you provide. The DocBook really > > trys to provide the elements that any given discilpline requires but at > > a maintenance cost. Can you provide an example as to how > > <dbjava:methodsynopsis> and <dbperl::methodsynopsis> would be > > differentiated in a document? Or is it as obvious as > > <dbjava:methodsynopsis>doSomething</dbjava:methodsynopsis>? Does the > > dbxxxx part provide the differentiation required for processing? > >Yes. That's it. The dbjava: and dbperl: in my examples are two >namespaces that would include a (different) <methodsynopsis> element. >The semantic meaning, processing expectations and content modules would >differ. Doesn't architectural forms provide a solution to this? syntax is different, but with a mapping pi the two could make good use of the same styling? See Arjun Rays excellent example on xml-dev this week. regards DaveP
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]