[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Re: Ruminations on the future of DocBook
At 15:37 17/07/2003 -0700, Norman Walsh wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >/ Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk> was heard to say: >| If relaxng is used, it would be nice to have some DTD based subset that >whilst >| not 100%, gave us a clue, and helped in increasing productivity, for >| later validation >| by a relaxng tool? > >I think it will be important to generate DTD and W3C XML Schema versions of >DocBook. It may be that these schemas will be less constraining (and therefore >incomplete for validation purposes) but they'll allow other tools to work with >DocBook. +1 for DTD's. -0 for xsd? regards DaveP
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]