[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Re: DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 30 Jul 2003
At 14:52 2003 08 18 +0100, David Carlisle wrote: > Any idea why David has the suffix "doc" in all the directory > names as in "iso8879doc", "mathmldoc", "xhtml1doc"? > > >The directories without "doc" on the end ("iso8879" etc) have xml dtd >entity declarations in them (.ent files) the ones with doc on the end >have assorted _doc_umentation, usually in html format. Ah, that makes sense. I guess what surprised me was not to find a pointer to the actual entity declaration files at the top level page http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/ so I assumed the *doc directories were all there were. >The directory structure will need a complete overhaul anyway once we >finally decide what exactly should be shipped (eg SGML style SDATA >entity declaration files, XSLT2 stylesheets specifying the new XSLT2 >character mapping facilty (?)... Of course it's a matter of taste >whether the different file formats should all be in the same directory >and distinguished by extension, or in separate directories. I haven't >any strong feeling about it. I think I prefer separate directories. I would expect many people would want to use a parallel directory structure when snatching a copy of this, and they may not need/want the doc. Put another way, if someone wants all the mathml decls, they should be able to download a complete directory and have the decls without doc files coming along. All to say that I don't disagree with your current setup; I might just suggest some reworking of the file at http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/ so that it's clear that the links under "Entity Sets" aren't, in fact, to the entity sets, but to documentation. paul
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]