[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Re: DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 20May 2003
Yann Dirson wrote: [...] > Replacing an sgml-sounding feature with an xml-sounding one does not > really seem appealing to me (esp. given my bias towards sgml ;). Norm wrote: "Yes, we should have added xmltag or renamed sgmltag years ago." The new element could be added and in that case wouldn't replace sgmltag. You would use the "sgml-sounding" element for SGML (and possibly some XML) stuff, and use the "xml-sounding" element for XML (and possibly some SGML) stuff. Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]