Re: [docbook] Re: DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 20May 2003

[Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>]

Yann Dirson wrote:
[...]
 > Replacing an sgml-sounding feature with an xml-sounding one does not
 > really seem appealing to me (esp. given my bias towards sgml ;).

Norm wrote: "Yes, we should have added xmltag or renamed sgmltag years ago."
The new element could be added and in that case wouldn't replace sgmltag.

You would use the "sgml-sounding" element for SGML (and possibly some 
XML) stuff, and use the "xml-sounding" element for XML (and possibly 
some SGML) stuff.

Tobi

-- 
http://www.pinkjuice.com/