[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Re: Free Shared Glossart Database of Computing Terms
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 08:19, Michael Smith wrote: > What about the Wikipedia? - > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DocBook > > All content there is covered under the GNU FDL, so you are free to > re-use it in any way you want as long as you tell where you got it from. > > Or for just computing terms, FOLDOC - > > http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?query=dtd&action=Search > > Though that is getting pretty out of date now. And I would reckon > that everything there is by now already available in the Wikipedia. > I was think more along the lines of an XML-instance structured in the Docbook Glossary format. One that people can use to perform glossary collection during processing and to which they can contribute new glossary entries. The result would essentially be a large glossary that can be used as a gloss database during processing. My reasoning for wanting this is that I often come across terms I would like to use as a glossentry in my docs, but in order to do so I must first have the entry in my glossary.xml. So I go through the process of making a new entry each time that I want to use a term that is not in the database. I figure, everyone must have the same problem. Constantly adding gloss entries to a database is a pain, well for me at least. It breaks my writing/markup flow. Why not have a central glossary.xml with many people contributing entries. In this way everyone benefits, since there is a greater chance, over time, that somebody already entered a gloss entry for the term you wish to use. Naturally, there has to be some consensus on the definition of a term. Besides that, once a terms is defined, the changes of it changing are minimal. Speaking of consensus there would also have to be a common agreement of what is a computing term and agreement on the semantics so that we have an inter-changeable document. Perhaps the way to start is for me to upload what I have, not much but a start, and let it run from there. Only question is where to put it? The other way would be if a company like O'Reilly would release their "dictionary of computer terms" and we can start with that. Obviously there is less forklifting if we can do it in the second way :-) Any other ideas from people? -- Sean Wheller sean@enbaya.co.za http://www.enbaya.co.za
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]