[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Agenda: 18 May 2005
Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net> writes: > 9. Annotation related RFEs: > > 973446 Replace Footnote with Annotation I submitted that one and status on it is now Closed. Norm closed it out with the comment "The semantics of annotation are now quite different from footnote." Which, FWIW, I agree with. I think it was also mentioned a while back that Footnote is is something that users are familiar with and expect and so should be kept. Which I agree with also. > 623524 (Re)Consider "choicelist" markup Mine too. And also now Closed. I don't see any point in trying to get it into v4.x. I had asked during a TC call a while back that it be moved to consideration for v5. But I don't feel very strongly about it. --Mike -- Michael Smith http://logopoeia.com/ http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/890
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]