Subject: RE: [docbook] Whatever happened too CSS+XML?
> When CSS gets implemented like, say Prince http://www.princexml.com/ CSSToXSLFO http://www.re.be/css2xslfo/ Flying Saucer https://xhtmlrenderer.dev.java.net/ KHTML 3.4 http://www.konqueror.org/css/ Opera 8 http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/#css Mozilla http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/CSS XXE http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/features.html XMetaL http://www.xmetal.com/en_us/products/xmetal_author/customized_user_interfaces.x > When CSS is accepted like, say Open eBook http://www.openebook.org/oebps/oebps1.2/download/oeb12-xhtml.htm#sec1.3.4 OpenReader http://www.openreader.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=72&Itemid=157 Microsoft Reader Authoring Guides, Markup Guide http://www.microsoft.com/reader/developers/downloads/markup.asp Standards and CSS in IE http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/07/29/445242.aspx Web Content Accessibility http://usability.gov/accessibility/ http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-CSS-TECHS/ Styling SVG with CSS http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/styling.html#StylingWithCSS XHTML 2.0 user agent rendering behaviour specified using CSS2 http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2-style.html#a_stylesheet Linking behaviour described in terms of CSS http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-hyperlinks/ > It still won't have 10% of the capability of XSLT. To the best of my knowledge, XSLT does not actually render anything. Using XSLT to transform XML into Netscape 4.7-compatible tag soup HTML is -- at best -- a wasted effort. An old article with a conclusion that still holds true What Place Has CSS in the XML World? http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2000/03/08/style/ Kind regards Peter Ring > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Pawson [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] > Sent: 7. november 2005 19:21 > To: Steven T. Hatton > Cc: email@example.com > Subject: Re: [docbook] Whatever happened too CSS+XML? > > > On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 17:05 -0500, Steven T. Hatton wrote: > > A few years back I was looking at this stuff, and never > understood why people > > weren't more interested in it. Basically, you should be > able to server a > > DocBook document on the web without every creating XHTML. > When I consider > > the effort that has been put into creating XSLT stylesheets > to generate > > XHTML, it seems the same amount of effort (or considerably > less) could > > produce XML + CSS that would have as much functionality as > any XHTML produced > > from the DocBook XML. > > Rubbish. > When CSS gets implemented > When CSS is accepted > It still won't have 10% of the capability of XSLT. > > > -- > Regards, > > Dave Pawson > XSLT + Docbook FAQ > http://www.dpawson.co.uk > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org > For additional commands, e-mail: email@example.com > >