[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] db.effectivity.attributes definition
I think that is an excellent suggestion. Please file an RFE for it. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises DocBook Consulting bobs@sagehill.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Camille Bégnis" <camille@neodoc.biz> To: "docbooklist" <docbook@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 3:31 AM Subject: [docbook] db.effectivity.attributes definition > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > while writing a specialization of DB5, I noticed the > db.effectivity.attributes definition directly holds the list of > attributes, instead of further referencing attributes definitions. > > That forces to redefine the whole db.effectivity.attributes definition > just to specialize userlevel for instance. > Since some of those attributes are used in profiling, I think it will > not be uncommon to see them specialized by constraining them to a fixed > list of possible values. Hence the interest of separate definitions for > each of those attributes. > > I hope it makes sense, if so should I submit a RFE? > > Camille. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFEsiyOjv9P65BfOUMRAj7bAKCZITZp7BZ1kYD4TMIt4ogiQ7iLhgCfZI/G > ch/Z5qDuo49oarRr4xq3XUY= > =YkOL > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]