[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: biblioentry or bibliomixed?
Bibliomixed is more suitable if the author wants to take more control of the presentation of the bibliography, at least the aspect of sequence, in the source level. IMO, given certain conditions, biblioentry is more advanced and convenient, because different organizations may have different requirements for bibliography, both in the aspect of sequence and items, for example, author first or title first, with or without ISBN, etc. In the above situation, the use of biblioentry is more convenient than bibliomixed. The author doesn't have to change the source. S/He just need a specific processing application to produce the required output. That conforms the DocBook philosophy--single source with multiple outputs.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]