biblioentry or bibliomixed?

[weakish <weakish@gmail.com>]

Bibliomixed is more suitable if the author wants to take more control of
the presentation of the bibliography, at least the aspect of sequence,
in the source level.

IMO, given certain conditions, biblioentry is more advanced and
convenient, because different organizations may have different
requirements for bibliography, both in the aspect of sequence and items,
for example, author first or title first, with or without ISBN, etc.

In the above situation, the use of  biblioentry is more convenient than
bibliomixed. The author doesn't have to change the source. S/He just
need a specific processing application to produce the required output.
That conforms the DocBook philosophy--single source with multiple outputs.