[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] cals tables: competing colwidths
Actually, the CALS table spec[1] is pretty clear on the matter. For example, in the section on <thead> it says: Any occurrence of <colspec> to redefine a column redefines the full set with its own name space and using the same total width as the enclosing <tgroup> or <entrytbl>. (An implicit default <colspec> with a width of "1*" is assumed for any <colspec> not explicitly redefined.) These redefined <colspec>s apply only to the contained <entry>s. It means the inner colspecs override the tgroup colspecs, which could lead to uneven column alignment in different parts of a table. The current DocBook XSL stylesheets don't implement that part of the spec and seem to just ignore colspec in tbody, thead, and tfoot. Handling new column widths would be a problem, because XSL-FO doesn't support changing column widths at those levels, so you would have to make each a separate fo:table. But colsep, rowsep, and span specs at those levels probably should be processed because they are part of the spec. The could be handled by the template in common/table.xsl named 'inherited.table.attribute' that computes the various properties of a cell. You could file a SourceForge bug report on this if you like. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises DocBook Consulting bobs@sagehill.net [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/specs/a502.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Starkenburg" <maxwell@owlnet.rice.edu> To: <docbook@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 8:30 AM Subject: [docbook] cals tables: competing colwidths >I had question that didn't seem answered in the CALS table spec. I'm > wondering what is supposed to happen if a tgroup, thead, and tbody all > have colspec children with different colwidth attributes in them, > especially if they are supposed to be in the same column. Does the level > with the widest colwidth value "win"? > > In case an example helps: > > <table> > <tgroup cols="2"> > <colspec colwidth="4*" /> > <colspec /> > <thead> > <colspec colwidth="2*" /> > <colspec /> > <row> > <entry>2*?</entry> > <entry>.</entry> > </row> > </thead> > <tfoot> > <colspec colwidth="3*" /> > <colspec /> > <row> > <entry>3*?</entry> > <entry>.</entry> > </row> > </tfoot> > <tbody> > <row> > <entry>4*?</entry> > <entry>.</entry> > </row> > </tbody> > </tgroup> > </table> > > I don't know whether the table should look something like this ... > _____________________ > | 2*? | . | > |_________________|___| > | 4*? | . | > |_________________|___| > | 3*? | . | > |_________________|___| > > ... or, heaven forbid, this ... > _____________ > | 2*? | . | > |_________|___|_______ > | 4*? | . | > |_________________|___| > | 3*? | . | > |_____________|___| > > ... or something else completely? > > Thanks, > > Max Starkenburg > http://cnx.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-help@lists.oasis-open.org > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]