[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Add topic element to DocBook?
Michael(tm) Smith wrote: > >> Essentially <topic> and <section> are the same, but not >> interchangeable correct? >> > > Not interchangeable in the sense that they could be siblings > within the same doc instance. For example, you couldn't do this: > > <section>... > <topic>... > <section>... > > Another difference is that while Section is not allowed as a child > of Book, Topic would be. If topic and section (and perhaps even sect[n]) could be aligned, with not dissimilar content models, it would make sense for marketing reasons. To have the db contributors slaving over variant content models for marketing reasons sounds a bit silly. I pause each time I come to section|sect1 already. If I had topic in the mix as well..... I guess I'd start laughing. I can see the mkt side, but please make it syntactic sugar for [you name it] to minimise the work load? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]