Re: [docbook] indexterm in footnote

[Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>]

On 07/14/2009 11:36 AM, Jirka Kosek wrote:
>
> The inconsistency comes from fact that parent/child relationships in TDG
> are based only on RELAX NG grammar. However rule that indexterm can't be
> descendant of footnote is expressed by additional Schematron rule. So it
> is best to validate your document against RELAX NG + Schematron at the
> same time.
>    

Where is it documented 'how' to do this please Jirka?
I'll add it to the FAQ.

As part of a validator run or separately?


regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk