[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] DocBook Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 15 July 2009
Cédric,
thank you so much for your comments. I'll bring this information up at our next meeting. Perhaps you would also be interested in joining the meeting to provide additional comments? Let me know and I'll send meeting info.
As for the similarity of the models, we wanted to enable semantic distinction in the elements, but provide a common framework for how lines would be marked up. Additional elements could be added as you have indicated, but we did not want to add so many specific elements to be too restrictive.This is why the db.all.blocks pattern is also allowed between lines and linegroups.
Thanks and best regards,
--Scott
Scott Hudson
Senior XML Architect
+1 (303) 542-2146 | Office
+1 (303) 332-1883 | Cell
Scott.Hudson@flatironssolutions.com
==========================================
Flatirons Solutions
http://www.flatironssolutions.com
Mimil Mimil wrote:
Hello,
I did some research and I found interesting document about screenplays (a dialogue base interaction too) and they use the following additional informations:
- scene numbering
- scene slugs: information about the action location (setting, location, time of the day)
- scene breaks: information about the action rhythm
- scene description: information about the action environment
- dialogue: vocal direction, emotion
Everything is explained at http://www.mediachops.com/producer_chops/1_Production_Cycle/PDFs/screenplay_formatting.pdf
Maybe something to take into account for the publisher spec?
Regards,
Cédric,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk <mailto:davep@dpawson.co.uk>> wrote:
On 07/20/2009 10:18 PM, Mimil Mimil wrote:
Hello,
I just have a little comment on 8.Publishing Subcommittee
report ... Scott suggests everyone read it and provide comments.
With an external view (no knowledge of publishing) I wondered
what is the real motivation to have 3 distinct elements
(dialogue, drama, poetry) because they seem to have the same
goal "speeches" and also have the same xml definition in the
spec
(http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/specs/publishers-1.0-spec-cd-01.pdf)
If the definition is the same, isn't the role attribute
sufficient within a single dialogue element?
Or is it a choice made to simplify the stylesheet work as
these elements really need a different printing layout?
Best regards,
Cédric,
With some (not a lot) of experience in marking up both poetry and
drama, I can state
that they are quite different in some ways, particularly if
certain aspects of the visual
presentation of the source is required to be captured.
regards
-- Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]