[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: docbook definition still based on DTD?
perhaps a silly question, but at the moment (as i read it), the definition of docbook is generally presented as the official DTD. however, there is also a schema for docbook and, given that schemas can represent things non-representable in simple DTDs, will there be a point where docbook (5.0?) can no longer be represented by a simple DTD? or has that already happened? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ========================================================================