[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] docbook definition still based on DTD?
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Jirka Kosek wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > perhaps a silly question, but at the moment (as i read it), the > > definition of docbook is generally presented as the official DTD. > > however, there is also a schema for docbook and, given that schemas > > can represent things non-representable in simple DTDs, will there be > > a point where docbook (5.0?) can no longer be represented by a simple > > DTD? or has that already happened? > > Please see the following comparison: > > http://www.docbook.org/docs/howto/#introduction-schemas thanks, that's exactly what i was after. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ========================================================================