[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] GSoC 2010 - Integration of BoostBook with DocBook
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:11:32 -0400 Stefan Seefeld <seefeld@sympatico.ca> wrote: > On 04/06/2010 02:56 AM, Dave Pawson wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 22:22:05 -0400 > > Stefan Seefeld<seefeld@sympatico.ca> wrote: > > > > > >> In fact, I hope that a similar strategy may be chosen for other > >> ports, such as the Website and Slides vocabularies, when they are > >> ported to DocBook 5. > >> > > > > > > Perhaps that's a good GSOC idea? Designing > > a strategy to 'part' docbook into sub-vocabs > > and provide a mechanism whereby any pairing could > > integrate without problems. > > > > Do you thinking of this as a separate project ? I was hoping that > such conceptual / design work could be part of the existing "applied" > projects such as the one we are discussing here, or the two others > about Website and Slides. IMHO website and slides are 'different' from, say, a poetry extension or a PHP or C++ specific extension? the latter add elements|attributes, perhaps remove some, i.e. customize the tagset. Website and slides may do so in a little way, but it is largely in the transformation to an output format that the work lies? If someone is concentrating on generating a new vocabulary for XXx then how that fits with other YYY customizations won't be at the top of their priority list? That would be the concern. regards -- regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]