Re: bibliomixed and extendedlink

[Nic Gibson <nicg@corbas.net>]

As Bob Stayton has just been kind enough to point out I've managed to make no sense here.

Please read this as:

I've just been looking at some XML coming in from a typesetter and noticed some misuse of <extendedlink> elements. Looking at what they were trying to do led me to suspect they should have been using a simple <link> element. Of course, these aren't allowed within bibliomixed elements. 

So, is there a particular reason why <extendedlink> is allowed within <bibliomixed> when <link> isn't?

yours in a vaguely embarrassed manner

nic

On 3 Jun 2011, at 09:42, Nic Gibson wrote:

I've just been looking at some XML coming in from a typesetter and noticed some misuse of <extendedlink> elements. Looking at what they were trying to do led me to suspect they should have been using a simple <link> element. Of course, these aren't allowed within bibliomisc elements. 

So, is there a particular reason why <extendedlink> is allowed within <bibliomisc> when <link> isn't?

cheers

nic

--

Nic Gibson
Corbas Consulting
Digital Publishing Consultancy and Training
http://www.corbas.co.uk, +44 (0)7718 906817

--

Nic Gibson
Corbas Consulting
Digital Publishing Consultancy and Training
http://www.corbas.co.uk, +44 (0)7718 906817