[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [docbook] DTD for DocBook?
Epic (which is now Arbortext Editor) supports DTD and XSD. I don't think it does RelaxNG. > -----Original Message----- > From: David Cramer [mailto:david@thingbag.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 20:45 > To: docbook@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [docbook] DTD for DocBook? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 12/14/2011 10:53 AM, Norman Walsh wrote: > > Getting a reasonable XSD for DocBook V5.x is a step closer to a > > DTD, but it's not a DTD. Does anyone care? > > > > Be seeing you, norm > > > > I doubt it. The use case for alternative schemas is in-editor > validation, right? AFAIK, all the editors that don't support RelaxNG > do support XSD: > > oXygen: RelaxNG, XSD, DTD > XMLMind: RelaxNG, XSD, DTD > emacs+nxml: RelaxNG > XMetaL: XSD, DTD > Serna: XSD > Epic: ???? > > So the XSD will let XMetaL and Serna users upgrade to DocBook 5.x. > > David > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO6XsvAAoJEMHeSXG7afUh9HkH/R1hRSFmDVxUjBDA9vpsYurh > LPCRA3X+GQH2SD+qnzYI87HytYjyI6MIHRMeNZdP4oSaU6/UK8Gdlh1+jwQJxq93 > R0ujyIvkDC+WOp3oc5UOvMufs9QlNahWdA2YNmca47ybW/rMd6QezMA2ekSGQKQK > 6PqFbV/C+XG+nir9Ar0joLGR5LZrNkd1eKepSLdc1xN38T/2GrruCOxPmDWboEo+ > CR2vOP3jt52VfxoPS10LimPycaxD3CrTuUgGa3vUIRtK6TublTdArBCIPCUC5qlr > yp0RLc4dQ1s6OsX8DTLrqDCMX2F6s7St9kHhL15JpyE6/GR8+CdTg7Vd5t0kJ7g= > =emiU > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]