[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Too Strict Content Model for abstract?
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:55:38 +0100
"Fekete, Róbert" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I agree with Thomas, I also dislike embedding not-inline elements in
Thanks, but my main concern is the limited content model of abstract.
The issue with para is more or less my own taste. ;) I wouldn't touch
para, because for some it could still be useful.
> @Simon: A wrapper element that could group any other elements would be
> immensely useful for single-sourcing. Currently I use <topic> for
> that, and have a preprocessing script that deletes the <topic> tags
> after xincludes are resolved, but that makes validating documents a
Yes, topic could also be used, however, it can't be nested.
Do you use your XIncludes with XPointer to skip topics or do you apply
a XSLT transformation? Just curious. ;)