Subject: Re: [docbook] Too Strict Content Model for abstract?
Hi, On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:55:30 +0100 Thomas Schraitle <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > currently, I've experienced some issues with the abstract element and > I'm wondering why it allows para elements only. > > According to the reference documentation of DocBook 4 and 5 [see 1,2], > abstract is definied like this: > > abstract ::= (title?, (formalpara|para|simpara)+) > > Well, for a short summary with only text, this is probably fine. > However, sometimes it is not enough. Thanks so far for the comments. It seems, there is a demand of extending abstract to allow block elements as direct children. I've created RFE #306 for this purpose: https://sourceforge.net/p/docbook/rfes/306/ :-) -- Gruß/Regards, Thomas Schraitle