[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Term DTD vs Schema in "DocBook V5.x XML DTD"
Thomas Schraitle <tom_schr@web.de> writes: > Additionally, even if we had a DTD for all versions, this wouldn't work > either. We have several, different schemas: DTD, RNG, SCH, NVDL, and XSD (5.0 > only). So I politely ask, if we could change that to a better term? What > about: > > DocBook V5.x XML Schemas > > Would that work? :) Thanks! Yes, that makes total sense. I expect the bit of infrastructure that builds those pages hasnât been updated since, uh, well, uh, since they were DTDs! Iâll see what I can do. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> https://nwalsh.com/ > One must not confuse scientific fact with scientific misconception. > They're more or less opposites, of course. But a scientific > misconception, if widely believed, creates a kind of truth of its own. > This doesn't seem to make sense, but it's true.--Adam Felber
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]