[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [docstandards-interop-discuss] Clarifications / Scope of the intended work?
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [docstandards-interop-discuss] Clarifications / Scope of
the intended work?
From: "Earley, Jim" <Jim.Earley@flatironssolutions.com>
Date: Tue, April 10, 2007 3:05 pm
To: "David RR Webber (XML)" <david@drrw.info>, "Dave Pawson"
<dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Cc: <docstandards-interop-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org>Dave, Let me back up a minute to see if I understand where you're coming from, and perhaps this might explain some of the lively banter we're having (honestly, very good discussion): Based on some of the threads so far, are the documents you're speaking of making interoperable already in PDF? If so, iText is very useful indeed for extracting XML content, and would in fact be a viable way of extracting content if the original source content wasn't available. If not, here's where I am having cognitive dissonance :) If the content we're speaking of is in DocBook, DITA, ODF, TEI or other XML standard, I'm not sure how iText allows us to leverage that XML content in one of these standards into another easily. It sounds like we might be coming from two different angles at "interoperability"? Jim ================ Jim Earley XML Developer/Consultant Flatirons Solutions 4747 Table Mesa Drive Boulder, CO 80301 Voice: 303.542.2156 Fax: 303.544.0522 Cell: 303.898.7193 Yahoo.IM: jmearley MSN.IM: jearley22@hotmail.com jim.earley@flatironssolutions.com -----Original Message----- From: David RR Webber (XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 12:52 PM To: Dave Pawson Cc: docstandards-interop-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [docstandards-interop-discuss] Clarifications / Scope of the intended work? Dave, Exactly! I'm stating the goals - to create an XML document format for technical document creation that combines DITA with ability to layout formatted text and graphic content with basic content handling motifs - example xhtml - but not to replace current page-orientated printed document storage formats. Instead page handling and rendering is specifically left to rendering tools. Support for content authoring and adherence to a formal document structure model via XML is required. By providing XML structured content - scripted process handling is enabled. DW "The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [docstandards-interop-discuss] Clarifications / Scope of the intended work? From: "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> Date: Tue, April 10, 2007 2:36 pm To: docstandards-interop-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org On 10/04/07, David RR Webber (XML) <david@drrw.info> wrote: > Ok - I've got it now - you are looking to create leap-frog technology - not > better ways of processing the current generation of technology that's > fielded. No, I'm trying to understand the goals of this group. Solutions follow problem understanding IMHO. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk <http://www.dpawson.co.uk/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docstandards-interop-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docstandards-interop-discuss-help@lists.oasis-open.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docstandards-interop-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docstandards-interop-discuss-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]