Re: [docstandards-interop-discuss] proposed TC name

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 23/04/07, David RR Webber (XML) <david@drrw.info> wrote:
>
> I actually quite like Eduardo's:
>
>  Documentation Standards Interoperability TC.
>
> "Documentation" is vague enough IMHO - and people will likewise need to read the charter for explicit clarifications

I like the terseness and yes, the generality.
All it means is we need clarification early on in the web pages /
actual standard
to scope the work, which is no bad thing IMHO.


> I'm not sure I'd go into machine v human readable - since that distinction is rapidly being eroded by smart machine agents.

Yes, I find that (potentially) too constraining. Most will stay one
side of their own
boundaries, but that doesn't mean that the other side is out of scope?

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk