docstandards-interop-tech message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [docstandards-interop-tech] Meeting next week?
- From: Michael Priestley <mpriestl@ca.ibm.com>
- To: "Raitz, Dennis H" <dennis.h.raitz@boeing.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:18:46 -0400
There is a separate discussion list
on DITA and S1000D - Scott Hudson has been leading that, do you think it
would make sense to merge the two?
Michael Priestley
IBM DITA Architect and Classification Schema PDT Lead
mpriestl@ca.ibm.com
http://dita.xml.org/blog/25
"Raitz, Dennis H"
<dennis.h.raitz@boeing.com>
03/30/2007 07:12 AM
|
To
| Michael Priestley/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA,
"Scott Hudson" <scott.hudson@flatironssolutions.com>
|
cc
| "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@oasis-open.org>,
<docstandards-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org>, <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
|
Subject
| RE: [docstandards-interop-tech] Meeting
next week? |
|
I see no mention of S1000D. I
thought the whole intent of this TC was to investigate the collaboration
of DITA and S1000D?
From: Michael Priestley [mailto:mpriestl@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 5:19 PM
To: Scott Hudson
Cc: Dee Schur; docstandards-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org; mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [docstandards-interop-tech] Meeting next week?
Last time we met we agreed that we would initiate the formation of a technical
committee, which starts with the formation of a formal public discussion
list. I did submit the request, but Mary had suggested an elaborated statement
of scope which I haven't provided yet.
Here's an attempt at expanded information:
Document standards such as DITA (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/dita),
DocBook http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/docbook), and ODF (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/office)
are designed to enable standardized content that can be used across applications
that conform to the standard. However, this reuse does not typically cross
the boundaries of the standards, because the standards are not usually
designed with cross-standard interoperability in mind. Members of the DITA,
DocBook, and ODF TCs are forming a technical committee to address this
problem. The work of the technical committee is likely to include the development
and documentation of scenarios for cross-standard content sharing; a specification
for an interoperability framework, including mappings from participating
standard formats to the framework; and requirements on participating standards
to improve interoperability.
Is that ok with folks on the current list?
Let's meet this Thursday to discuss taking the message back to our respective
TCs. My apologies for letting the proposal lag.
Michael Priestley
IBM DITA Architect and Classification Schema PDT Lead
mpriestl@ca.ibm.com
http://dita.xml.org/blog/25
"Scott Hudson"
<scott.hudson@flatironssolutions.com>
03/29/2007 12:46 PM
|
To
| "Dee Schur" <dee.schur@oasis-open.org>
|
cc
| Michael Priestley/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA,
<docstandards-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org>, <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
|
Subject
| Re: [docstandards-interop-tech] Meeting
next week? |
|
I was going to ask the same question! Do we have everything we need to
initiate the formation of a TC? Are we going to set up regularly scheduled
meetings?
--Scott
Dee Schur wrote:
Just wondered what was going on with this group? What do we need to do
to create the discussion list?
Thanks,
Dee
From: Michael Priestley [mailto:mpriestl@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 12:27 PM
To: docstandards-interop-tech@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [docstandards-interop-tech] Meeting next week?
Please let me know what days/times would be available for a continuing
meeting - I'd like to set up a series of telecons to discuss plans for
this year and review some new work by Flatirons on an interoperability
framework.
My default preference is for Thursday 2 PM ET
Michael Priestley
IBM DITA Architect and Classification Schema PDT Lead
mpriestl@ca.ibm.com
http://dita.xml.org/blog/25
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/697 - Release Date: 2/22/2007
11:55 AM
--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/702 - Release Date: 2/25/2007
3:16 PM
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]