[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: moving forward with proposals
Is it the intention of this group to continue DSML down an LDAP-centric model, or to consider other directory ideas? And what about other technologies like SAML, SOAP, etc...? Or is this spelled out in a charter somewhere, and I'm just being out-of-place and rude? -andy On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 02:29:06PM -0700, Tony Gullotta wrote: > We've seen a few proposals from different groups for DSML 2.0 lately. > Microsoft's was the most recent. What are the next steps for getting a > consensus on a direction to take? > > Our group had sent in one, but I would much rather reach a compromise > with someone else's approach at this point to get the standard in place > instead of having a stand-off. Microsoft's was similar enough to ours in > principal that I think we could work with that one. Does anyone else > strongly favor or strongly apose any of these recommendations? > > Tony Gullotta > Chief Software Architect > www.access360.com > > access360 > A Better Way to Manage Access Rights > > -- Andrew Newton VeriSign Applied Research anewton@research.netsol.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC