RE: [dsml] Proposal: Batch* -> DsmlBatch*

[Shon Vella <SVELLA@novell.com>]

Yes. However, since as far as I can tell the only other constructs that use the Dsml prefix are type and group names, not element names, and I could live with them either way.

Shon Vella
Software Engineer, Consultant
svella@novell.com
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net services software
www.novell.com 

>>> Jeff Parham <jeffparh@windows.microsoft.com> 10/15/01 02:26PM >>>
Then do you advocate taking the "Dsml" prefix out of other constructs in
the schema?

-----Original Message-----
From: Shon Vella [mailto:SVELLA@novell.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 12:25 PM
To: dsml@lists.oasis-open.org; Jeff Parham
Subject: Re: [dsml] Proposal: Batch* -> DsmlBatch*


I don't like include Dsml in the element name since it is already
qualified by the dsml namespace.

Shon Vella
Software Engineer, Consultant
svella@novell.com 
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net services software
www.novell.com 

>>> Jeff Parham <jeffparh@windows.microsoft.com> 10/15/01 12:49PM >>>
Here's a (hopefully) non-controversial proposal:
 
In the baseline schema the envelopes were named DsmlEnvelopeRequest and
DsmlEnvelopeResponse.  In the current schema they're BatchRequest and
BatchResponse.  I propose we take the best of both and name them
DsmlBatchRequest and DsmlBatchResponse.
 
-J


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>