RE: [dss-comment] Public Comment

["Nick Pope" <nickpope@secstan.com>]

Inma,

Thanks for bringing this to our attention.  We are aware of this and it will
be corrected in the next version which will be available shortly.

Nick Pope

> -----Original Message-----
> From: comment-form@oasis-open.org [mailto:comment-form@oasis-open.org]
> Sent: 24 March 2006 12:32
> To: dss-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [dss-comment] Public Comment
>
>
> Comment from: inma@dif.um.es
>
> Name: Inma Marín
>
> Title: IT Consultant
>
> Organization: University of Murcia
>
> Regarding Specification: DSS Core Committee Draft
>
> 3 (DSS Core Elements)
>
>
>
> A <VerifyRequest> inherits from RequestBaseType. In the schema,
> RequestBaseType has InputDocument as a mandatory element.
> However, in "4.5. Basic Processing form CMS Signatures" it is
> said that "2. [...] if the CMS signature is enveloping, it
> contains its own input data and there MUST NOT be any input
> documents present". Then, is there a mistake in the schema and
> element InputDocuments must be optional inside RequestBaseType?
>
>
>
> Thank you very much in advance.
>
>
>
> Inma.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dss-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dss-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>
>