Scope of interop

[Juan Carlos Cruellas <cruellas@ac.upc.edu>]

Dear all, also during yesterday's call we started to talk about the 
scope of the interop. By scope we meant on what protocols (i.e., core 
and profiles) we would like to define test cases and conduct interop 
tests, and for each of those profiles and/or core, what features we 
would like to target.

Could we start a thread of discussion on this topic?

Here it comes my initial contribution, restricted to the core :

Core: I think that we should define test cases for the core. As for 
features see below:
Type of input documents:
<InputDocuments>: I would say that we should deal with <Base64XML>, 
<Base64Data> and <InLineXML>.

Features proposed to be tested for signing protocol (Optional Inputs):
<ClaimedIdentity>
<SignatureType> (this also relates one of the questions that were raised 
during the discussion: what signatures should be tested?)
One signature detached and one enveloping (this last one requires 
<IncludeObject> optional input).
<SignaturePlacement>

(not sure of SignedReference)

Will think of verification protocol and raise a proposal...

At the meeting it was commented that the csvr profile would be one of 
the targetted profiles, although maybe in not its entire extension at 
the first iteration, as it is rather complex....

Please make comments to this and also let us know your views on profiles 
that should also be targetted...

Regards