OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dss-x message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [dss-x] Fwd: [dss-x-comment] Questions about DSS-X Local Signature Computation Version 1.0

Dear Enrst Jan,

Sorry for not reacting before (I was out of Barcelona on the 28 and 29th). I have taken a look to your documents and they seem OK to me.

Juan Carlos.
El 27/9/16 a las 13:58, Ernst Jan van Nigtevecht escribió:
Dear team members,

We received some comments on the local signature profile.

I have prepared a response ('Comment and Reply.doc') and a list of
changes for the XSD/document ('Changes.doc').

Hopefully we can come to some conclusions during the next conf. call.

With kind regards

Ernst Jan

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [dss-x-comment] Questions about DSS-X Local Signature
Computation Version 1.0
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:20:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Szabó Áron <baronsz@freemail.hu>
To: dss-x-comment@lists.oasis-open.org

Dear Members,

I am writing in connection with Local Signature Computation Version 1.0

I have seen the e-mail sent on 2015-08-25 about the announcement of
publication the specification Version 1.0. I looked through the related
descriptions and schemas and I found that somehow the "final" version of
XML schema does not correspond to "final" version of specification. I
could perform XML schema validations on sample XML files by using
"csprd02". E.g. from "final" XML schema the "RequestDocumentHash" is
missing, it contains "ReturnDocumentHash". Also there was a comment
about this in "Appendix E" but it is not clear which version may be the
last: 'Processed the comments on CSD 01; see
Renamed localsig:ReturnDocumentHash into localsig:RequestDocumentHash
(in Section in the code).' So, shall I use
"RequestDocumentHash" or "ReturnDocumentHash" in SignRequest messages?

The other thing that was interesting that at Two-Step Approach operation
mode (identified by:
"http://docs.oasis-open.org/dss-x/ns/localsig/two-step-approach"), the
"Profile" attribute at the SECOND SignRequest MUST also be
"http://docs.oasis-open.org/dss-x/ns/localsig". For the FIRST
SignRequest, it is clear, that this identifies that returned value shall
be just a simple hash, but at the SECOND SignRequest the client shall
identify the finalized type of the result Signature structure which
should be e.g. "urn:oasis:names:tc:dss:1.0:profiles:XAdES" in case of
XAdES, isn't it?!

Anyway, just in general, I can say, that I liked the descriptions of all
uses cases in this document. They are all in conformance with NPAPI-free
operation modes that are supported by recently used, eIDAS-conform eID
systems such as German or Hungarian national eID cards.

BR, Aron

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]