[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dss-x] Some feedback on the core 2.0 document
Hi Andreas, The ContainerType is intended for encapsulating 'any' future structures/components ('The ContainerType is a composite data type that can contain an arbitrary number of components'). But I must admit that the current 'formal' description may be a bit weak. I agree with you that we have to find some formal language; at the same time, the formal language should not be too complicated :-) At the moment the Remote Signing profile document does not use a formal generic language... Regards Ernst Jan Andreas Kuehne wrote: > Hi Ernst Jan, >> Please find attached some feedback on >> "dss-core-v2.0-wd01-2016-06-26.docx". (I have used LibreOffice, they >> layout is a bit ruined, so don't use it further!!). >> >> ** I have made pdf versions of the pages that I have changed. I did not >> yet go through the whole document (it's a lot!)... ** >> >> Hope it helps a bit in separating the generic semantics and specific >> mappings to xml or json. > > sorry, but I'm afraid I didn't get the 'ContainerType' approach right. > Is it a generic base type of all types holding sub-elements? > > Moreover the current approach to define structures normatively using > common language and later on do a manual mapping to different schema > formats seems work intense, error prone, unmaintainable and hard to > comprehend for a reader. I would prefer some type of 'central' formal > language and derive the common language description and the specific > schemes from it. > > Do you do something similar with the Remote Signing profile document? > > Greetings, > > Andreas >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]