OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dss-x message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [dss-x] Naming of adapted schemes


Hi Ernst Jan,

> The use of 'rewritten' in de namespace is a good hint about the original
> schema. The use of a prefix with '-rw' is fine but is less formal (a
> user may change the prefix but cannot change the namespace).
thanks for your opinion!
Yes, the prefix is relevant for our schemes, only. But to make the
distinction as obvious as possible I want to use different prefixes.
>
> As a note, regarding the oasis naming conventions:
>
> "URN-based namespaces are also allowed, but HTTP scheme namespace URIs
> are to be preferred"
>
> (http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/namingGuidelines/resourceNamingV08.html)
>
> Maybe we should follow this convention. One advantage is that the URI
> can be resolved to the the actual XSD (if we put the files in the right
> sub-folders).
>
>
> >From http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/ndr/namingDirectives.html
Yes, we agreed on one of the last meetings that we want to move to the
http scheme. Stefan is just about to clarify the details of the path
(e.g. '../dss/..' vs '../dss-x/..').

Greetings,

Andreas
> --
> Formal declarations of XML namespaces are made using a family of
> reserved attributes (e.g., xmlns attributes (PrefixedAttName
> xmlns:[prefix] and DefaultAttName xmlns) and targetNamespace) in XML
> instances and schemas.
>
>     An XML namespace name identified by an HTTP scheme URI reference
> must conform to the pattern:
>
>         http://docs.oasis-open.org/[tc-shortname]/ns/xxxx
> --
>
> Proposal for each of the (possibly rewritten) schema components:
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/dss-x/ns/2.0/@@<component>@@@
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Ernst Jan
>
>
> Andreas Kuehne wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> I would like to raise a detail regarding the naming of the included
>> schemes the were adapted to the fit the DSS V 2.0 approach (no anys, no
>> mixed content, NSPrefix-Mapping). Currently I use a mapping from
>>
>>
>>     http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#, prefix 'ds'
>>
>> to
>>
>>     urn:oasis:names:tc:dss-x:2.0:xmldsig:rewritten, prefix 'ds-rw'
>>
>>
>> As we got the final definition of our final namespace still open I would
>> like to address the adapted namespaces in parallel. So I can do  a
>> single fixup of all namespaces once we are done. What's your opinion to
>> define the namespaces of the modified  schemes in the DSS subtree and to
>> add a postfix (e.g. '-rw' for rewritten) to the namespace prefix?
>>
>>
>> Comments welcome,
>>
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>
>

-- 
Andreas Kühne 
phone: +49 177 293 24 97 
mailto: kuehne@trustable.de

Trustable Ltd. Niederlassung Deutschland Gartenheimstr. 39C - 30659 Hannover Amtsgericht Hannover HRB 212612

Director Andreas Kühne

Company UK Company No: 5218868 Registered in England and Wales 




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]