RE: [dss] some changes in requirements draft 3

[Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>]

At 01:23 AM 4/11/2003 -0400, jmessing wrote:

>However, none of these assertions apply to eNotarization in the presence 
>of a notary, as the notary does the authentication in person. So... at 
>least one use case is automatically excluded by this choice. Why is that 
>desirable or laudable?

A SAML Authentication Assertion could have an <AuthenticationMethod> of 
"unspecified", or a new AuthenticationMethod could be defined to represent 
notary-style human authentication.

Is there a better solution that you're thinking of?


Trevor