[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dss] Object naming guidelines
At 05:25 PM 9/4/2003 -0400, Tim Moses wrote: >Trevor - Good feedback. I'll update the document with the non-contentious >points and wait for discussion of any contentious ones. > >- The new OASIS Procedure changes the name from Committee Specification to >Committee Draft. ah, right. >- In the interests of brevity, I don't mind the abbreviation 'wd'. What do >other want? Now that "draft" is ambiguous with "Working Draft" and "Committee Draft", "wd" is probably best. >- You are right, I haven't taken account of different kinds of draft: those >that are recognized as committee drafts and those that are simply >contributions. We should deal with that. I assume you don't mean "Committee Draft" in the official OASIS sense. I was just talking about distinguishing: - Working Drafts which are TC consensus (i.e. Requirements Doc) - Working Drafts which are individual submissions We could just tag names to the latter, i.e. "wd-moses", "wd-perrin"... Trevor
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]