[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dss] Minutes for 25 Aug meeting
Rich, I agree that we don't need to get into management protocols for the implicit parameters now, if ever. I do think that we need to provide a "framework" in the core of how implicit parameters, applications profiles etc are used to control the various options within the protocol, along with some "generally useful" parameters. Nick > -----Original Message----- > From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com] > Sent: 04 September 2003 17:29 > To: Trevor Perrin > Cc: OASIS DSS TC > Subject: Re: [dss] Minutes for 25 Aug meeting > > > I think application profiles (and their implied behaviors) become more > important for verifying signatures than they are for creating them. > > I would like to see management of implicit parameters be a separate > document (and conformance point) from this WG, and not part of the basic > DSS operations. I think enumerating "typical implied parameters" is a > good thing to do in our core document, but leave details and mgmt to a > separate spec we do later. > /r$ > -- > Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect > DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com > XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html > XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the > roster of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_wor > kgroup.php. > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]