[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dss] REFORMULATED ISSUE#2: SIGNATURECONTENTS (SIGN REQUEST DISCUSSION)
Juan Carlos, You say: "Imagine you send two documents. For the first one you define three transformations: you want the server to generate three documents (A1,A2,A3) and sign them. For the second you define two transformations: you want the server to generate two documents (B1,B2) and sign them. Now imagine you want A1,A2 and B2 enveloped; B1 detached and A3 Enveloping the signature." The last bit about "A3 Enveloping the signature" confuses me. I understand how an InputDocument can envelope the signature. But you seem to be saying the server would return the signature inserted into one of the *post-transformed* Input Documents? I don't think that's what an Enveloped Signature means in DSIG. So when you say: "Question: HOW TO EASILY IDENTIFY HERE THAT THE DOCUMENT THAT HAS TO CONTAIN THE ds:Signature IS PRECISELY A3,. The most simple answer: WELL; JUST INDICATE WITH AN INTEGER THE ORDER NUMBER OF THE CORRESPONDING DocumentSelector!!. And yes, this would work, but, at what price?" I don't think A3 *will* contain the ds:Signature. The InputDocument that was transformed to A3 will contain the signature. So you would want to indicate with an integer the corresponding *InputDocument*, not DocumentSelector. Thus it doesn't make sense to associate a SignaturePlacementType with DocumentSelector, as you propose. Do you agree? Trevor
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]