re: [dss] Call for claimed identity scenarios

["Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com>]

I agree that we do not want to define new mechanisms.  I was more thinking
that if a DSS server required to use one of the existing authentication
mechanisms (kerberos, SAML, Liberty ...) for authenticating it users which
is stronger what is generally required for user login to web services this
can be supported.

Nick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com]
> Sent: 03 November 2003 18:45
> To: Nick Pope
> Cc: Hal Lockhart; dss@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [dss] Call for claimed identity scenarios
>
>
> > This is similar to the scenario which I just posted.  Except I was
> > considering that a different form of authentication may be required.
>
> Okay, for that part I agree with Hal that DSS should not be defining a
> new authentication mechanism.
> 	/r$
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the
> roster of the OASIS TC), go to
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_wor
> kgroup.php.
>
>
>