[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dss] plans for next draft
> Agreed. But would we not be obliged to define at least the default Timestamp > type (URI) in the core ? Yes, we must be define *any* URI's that we specify in the spec. In his note, I think Frederick was proposing we do what DSIG did, which is define a "base URI" http://www.oasis-open.org/2003/dss# And then a timestamp URI just adds a "fragment" to that, as in http://www.oasis-open.org/2003/dss#timestamp I think OASIS prefers URN's, tho. Something for our chairs to check up on? /r$ -- Rich Salz Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]