dss message

Subject: RE: [dss] core spec wd-16

From: Pieter Kasselman <PKasselman@betrusted.com>
To: 'Rich Salz' <rsalz@datapower.com>, Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:58:09 -0000

Title: RE: [dss] core spec wd-16

I would be in favour of keeping it as well.

Cheers

Pieter

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com]
Sent: 22 March 2004 03:03
To: Trevor Perrin
Cc: dss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [dss] core spec wd-16

> 4) Should RequestID be removed?
> This was to correlate requests and responses. The HTTP POST binding
> doesn't need it. The SOAP binding will mostly run over HTTP (?), in which
> case it doesn't need it. So do we need this?

Other protocols -- SAML, XKMS for example -- have it. So I vote to keep
it.

/r$

--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dss/members/leave_workgroup.php.