[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: EPM Profile Review
Hi Juan-Carlos, Once again thanks for pointing the TOC issue out. I will fix it. On the other note, I was thinking exactly the same thing with respect to the XAdES referencing. Ed cruellas@ac.upc.es wrote: Ed, The second version of the EPM document that I have downloaded has a missmatch between the section numbering in the TOC and the section numbering in the document body. I do not know if this is due to a problem with my computer and Word, but just in case other people experience the same problem, I make the considerations below. I think that this is due to the fact that in the body there are three paragraphs that, instead being marked as "Normal" Style are marked as "Title 1" Style: those that now start sections 4,5 and 6. If you change the styles in these paragraphs then the TOC numbering and the body sections numbering will match. It is in the light of the numbering in the TOC that my comments must be read. Could I make two additional comments to the document? COMMENT#7: TOC has missed, within section 3.2.3 one sub-section: the one corresponding to COMMENT#8: Do you think that could be worth to make reference to XAdES / TS 101733 in the document? Regards
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]