[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dss] FW: [dss-comment] Public Comment
It might also be a useful time for any one who is a member of the TC who has undeclared IP to declare it now. > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: [dss] FW: [dss-comment] Public Comment > From: "Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com> > Date: Fri, April 01, 2005 9:32 am > To: "John Messing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com> > Cc: "OASIS DSS TC" <dss@lists.oasis-open.org> > > John, > > I think the comment arose from looking at the IPR statements. I would like > to say something a bit more encouraging then point at what he already knows. > But I do recognise that this is a very tricky issue and that generally the > least said the better. > > I take it that you think the suggested words sticks out my neck too far. > > Nick > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Messing [mailto:jmessing@law-on-line.com] > > Sent: 01 April 2005 16:09 > > To: Nick Pope > > Cc: OASIS DSS TC > > Subject: RE: [dss] FW: [dss-comment] Public Comment > > > > > > I would recommend simply providing a pointer to the page of the TC which > > discloses IPR and indicate that that is the IPR of which we are aware to > > date. > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > > Subject: RE: [dss] FW: [dss-comment] Public Comment > > > From: "Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com> > > > Date: Fri, April 01, 2005 5:40 am > > > To: "OASIS DSS TC" <dss@lists.oasis-open.org> > > > > > > I propose the following response to the IPR question raised below. > > > > > > "Whilst it is not possible to make definitive statements > > regarding IPR we > > > are not aware of any company requiring payment of royalties for > > use of the > > > DSS core protocol." > > > > > > Nick Pope > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Nick Pope [mailto:pope@secstan.com] > > > > Sent: 21 March 2005 17:40 > > > > To: OASIS DSS TC > > > > Subject: [dss] FW: [dss-comment] Public Comment > > > > > > > > > > > > Forwarding FYI > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: comment-form@oasis-open.org [mailto:comment-form@oasis-open.org] > > > > Sent: 21 March 2005 11:12 > > > > To: dss-comment@lists.oasis-open.org > > > > Subject: [dss-comment] Public Comment > > > > > > > > > > > > Comment from: arm@dif.um.es > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > I'm writing you because I would like to comment that in the > > new release of > > > > the document, it is commented that in the enveloping > > signature there is a > > > > new attribute ObjectId. However, this attribute is missing in the new > > > > schema. > > > > > > > > The other comment is that I have some doubts about IPR > > statements. I have > > > > being seen them, and I would like to know if the > > implementation of this > > > > specification supposes the payment of some royalties to the > > > > enterprise that > > > > claims some IPR. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Antonio. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dss-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dss-help@lists.oasis-open.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > > > generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your > > TCs in OASIS > > > at: > > > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]