RE: [dss] Action 05-04-18-05: use of xs:any

["Nick Pope" <pope@secstan.com>]

Juan Carlos,

I vaguely recall that at the last call there was preference for option 1 as
this was what is currently used in XML Signature.  Am I correct?

Nick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juan Carlos Cruellas [mailto:cruellas@ac.upc.edu]
> Sent: 29 April 2005 13:07
> To: DSS TC List
> Subject: [dss] Action 05-04-18-05: use of xs:any
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> In the last conf call we were talking about the usage of
> <xs:any> within a <xs:choice>...
> Currently there are two potential solutions to the Unique
> Particle Attribution problem that our current schema does have:
>
> 1. The approach suggested by Konrad: use
>  <xs:any namespace="#other" processContents="lax"/>
>
> This particle stands for any element DEFINED OUTSIDE the
> namespace defined for the core. In case that in the future
> some of the choices could be another element of the core not
> present in the list of choices at that moment, it would be
> necessary to change the xml schema and add an explicit
> mention to that element. We should also make sure that any
> profile profiling the contents of one of this choices by
> adding new elements, should have its own namespace.
>
> 2. To use the <dss:AnyType> already defined in the core.
> This avoids any consideration about the namespace of its
> contents, but introduces a new level in the xml tree....
>
> Does anybody have a special preference for one of them?
>
> Regards
>
> Juan Carlos.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your
> TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>