[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dss] [Fwd: Async comments by Tommy]
Andreas, I understand that this change addresses Tommy's first comment about there being a common ancestor type for request & response. Unless I have missed it, I think there is still need to reflect the second comment about having an optional response ID. Would it be possible to identify the specific changes made. Nick > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Kuehne [mailto:kuehne@klup.de] > Sent: 25 September 2005 19:48 > To: Nick Pope > Cc: Tommy Lindberg; dss@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [dss] [Fwd: Async comments by Tommy] > > > Hi all, > > as I proposed some days ago here are my extensions of the core schema. > It's fueled by the shortcomings in the Async profile identified by Tommy. > > Now there are new bases type for sign/verify requests and responses. > This abstraction layer shouldn't any bad impact on other structures. > > Please have a sharp look ... > > Greetings > > Andreeas > > >Andreas, Tommy and all DSS > > > >Following on from the issue raised by Tommy some time ago > suggesting adding > >an optional response ID to the SignResponse and VerifyResponse > in support of > >asynchronous operation. > > > >Is there any objection for inclusion of this change in the next > draft of the > >CD for confirmation at the next meeting? > > > >Nick > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]