Tommy's comment on schema extension [ was Re: [dss] [Fwd: Async comments by Tommy] ]

[Andreas Kuehne <kuehne@klup.de>]

Hi Tommy !
 
> I haven't looked at it in detail yet but I can see that you have introduced
> abstract ancestors for both requests and responses - doing the request as
> well, is a nice touch providing symmetry.
Sorry, didn't introduce that much beauty : 
There are separate base  types for requests and responses.

> However, what I meant in my note was that there should be a *concrete*
> <Response> element and that <SignResponse> and <VerifyResponse> should be
> extended from that concrete element.
As said above there is  'ResponseBaseType' being the ancestor of <SignResponse> and <VerifyResponse>.

> The additional attribute ResponseID should be an optional attribute to the
> <Response> element.
I thought of 'resusing' the RequestID in case it is not given by the requestor. 
This RequestID could be supplied by the client or in certain cases by the server alternatively.

Greetings

Andreas


_________________________________________________________________________
Mit der Gruppen-SMS von WEB.DE FreeMail können Sie eine SMS an alle 
Freunde gleichzeitig schicken: http://freemail.web.de/features/?mc=021179