RE: [dss] issues document

["Ed Shallow" <ed.shallow@rogers.com>]

I remember a similar debate back in 2004 between Trevor and I. Back then I argued for a collapse of selected elements to address this asymmetry. Point is it never got addressed. 

 

http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200409/msg00039.html

 

Ed

---

From: Carlos Gonzalez-Cadenas [mailto:gonzalezcarlos@netfocus.es]
Sent: August 29, 2006 9:36 AM
To: 'DSS TC List'
Subject: [dss] issues document

All,

 

I’ve made some proposals that I think should be considered in the “DSS Issues Document”

 

• SignatureObject and InputDocuments Asymmetry: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200607/msg00011.html
• TimestampingRequest/TimestampingResponse for generating timestamps in the core (including the functionalities of signature timestamping that are now inside SignRequest/SignResponse and the standalone timestamp creation in the Timestamping Profile): http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200607/msg00034.html (section 5.c.vi)

 

I have some more functionality to consider for the future, but I think it’s more appropriate to wait until the final 1.0 spec is released

 

Regards

 

Carlos