NIST perpetuating wrong notion of ebXML and SOA

["David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info>]

I just found this document from 2007.

 

Its out for review and comment:

http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-95/SP800-95.pdf

 

Once again we see the notion of "complicated" being attached to ebXML - when in fact the reverse can be the case!

 

That ebXML contract and secure ebMS exchanges are better suited to much of what people want to do with SOA than a WSDL approach!

 

Suggest we can produce a Top Reasons to Use ebXML for 2009 and submit this as feedback to NIST

(similar to the format of this - http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/30366/EML-Top-Reasons.pdf)

 

Happy 2009 Everyone!

 

Thanks, DW